James White on Modern Seminaries

In the above video, Dr. James White gives a rather off-the-cuff commentary on Christian higher education, particularly the nature of today’s seminary environment.  I must say that I appreciate every one of his comments here and that his words should be heard by every young man considering a seminary education.  To be sure, White isn’t against seminaries (nor am I) but rather what they’ve become in most cases.  This isn’t directed at those seminaries which remain connected to the church and are faithful in their stated doctrines.

The temptation to be liked by the world is one faced by virtually every denomination within the church.  Since the Reformed tradition is known for its learned men and emphasis upon scholarship, Reformed Christians face the particular temptation of wanting to be accepted by broader academia.  I’m not going to give specific names in this post, but I can think of a few well-known Reformed authors right off the top of my head who have compromised on certain essential doctrines, namely the doctrine of creation.

While I’m certainly not against a robust academic tradition within Christianity, it must never be disconnected from the church.  The main reason seminaries exist is to prepare men for the ministry.  Men who attend seminary should be more concerned with the pulpit than becoming published authors.  Again, there’s nothing wrong with publishing academic works–so long as they edify the church.  As a seminary student myself, I say that our chief concern should be exalting the name of Christ rather than building a name for ourselves.

This entry was posted in ministry, seminary, teaching, theology. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to James White on Modern Seminaries

  1. Phil Brown says:

    I think White is correct to say what he said for the most part. However, he is criticizing men who have drank from the same fountain of unbelieving skepticism that has fueled his belief in the Critical Text of the New Testament. Therefore, it seems to me that he is inconsistent, but concerning the substance of what he said here, I think he is right on.

    • Phil, I agree with you 100%. I wasn’t going to say it in the post, but I’m glad somebody else did. 🙂 Every theologian has his blind spot and that just happens to be his. I’m sure I have one as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s